<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dental Restoration 101 &#187; The European Commission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dentalrestoration101.com/tag/the-european-commission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dentalrestoration101.com</link>
	<description>Your guide to dental restoration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Safety of dental amalgam II</title>
		<link>http://dentalrestoration101.com/amalgam/safety-of-dental-amalgam-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://dentalrestoration101.com/amalgam/safety-of-dental-amalgam-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amalgam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The European Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dentalrestoration101.com/amalgam/safety-of-dental-amalgam-ii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image Source: Theodoregrey Yep, apparently the debate on the safety of dental amalgam is still ongoing. This time, it is The European Commission that has launched a consultation process which will run until February 22, 2008 that will focus on two scientific opinions regarding dental amalgam and its alternatives. Presenting the two views: Scientific Committee [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://dentalrestoration101.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/mercury.jpg' title='mercury.jpg'><img src='http://dentalrestoration101.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/mercury.jpg' alt='mercury.jpg' /></a><br />
<small><em><br />
Image Source: <a href=" http://www.theodoregray.com/PeriodicTable/Samples/080.13/s7s.JPG"> Theodoregrey</a><br />
</em></small></p>
<p>Yep, apparently the debate on the safety of dental amalgam is still ongoing. This time, it is <strong>The European Commission</strong> that has launched a consultation process which will run until February 22, 2008 that will focus on two scientific opinions regarding dental amalgam and its alternatives.</p>
<p>Presenting the two views:</p>
<p><strong>Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR)</strong> made a preliminary report attempting to answer the question, ï¿½Are dental amalgam and alternative dental restoration materials safe for patients and users?ï¿½ The results of the study were released on November 29, 2007. The conclusion is that amalgam is an effective restorative material and is deemed quite safe to be considered as the material of choice for some restorations. Incidences of adverse effects of amalgam and its materials are low and readily managed. Amalgam does not pose a risk to health apart from allergic reactions. </p>
<p><strong>The Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER)</strong> also made a preliminary report released  on November 29, 2007. This study however focuses more on the environmental risks and indirect health effects of mercury in dental amalgam. The committee concludes that certain environmental risks exist in the involvement of the use of amalgam. Most of these are related to indirect exposure of humans to methylmercury.  Although said risks are lower than tolerable limits, and therefore making them a low risk for more serious health effects, the issue of safety is still a matter of debate. Existing information is too limited to assess the environmental risks and indirect health effects. After all, Methylmercury is the most toxic type of mercury. Further study is still needed on this as available information on toxic effects of alternatives is still very limited to hold a proper comparative assessment.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.cybermed.it/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=16806&#038;Itemid=134"> Cybermed </a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dentalrestoration101.com/amalgam/safety-of-dental-amalgam-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

